Graz, 25-26 May 2017
May 25, 2017
11:00-12:10 Joseph Bendana (CUNY) “Implicit Biases Are Probably Beliefs”
13:30-14:40 Martina Fürst (Graz) “Implicit bias and phenomenal concepts”
15:00-16:10 Anna Welpinghus (Dortmund) “The role of imagination for implicit bias”
16:30-17:40 (Keynote) Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside) “The Pragmatic Metaphysics of Belief”
May 26, 2017
10:00-11:10 (Keynote) Josefa Toribio (ICREA-UB) “Fragmented beliefs or associations: the case of implicit attitudes”
11:30-12:40 Cristina Borgoni (Graz) and Yannig Luthra (UCLA) “Fragmentation and Implicit biased Attitudes”
14:00-15:10 Annemarie Kalis (Utrecht) “Implicit bias: what’s the problem?”
15:30-16:40 Round Table.
Venue: Heirinchstrasse 26, 5th Floor, room 09.51. Graz, Austria. The venue is accessible by elevator. Everyone is welcome.
Organizers: Cristina Borgoni, Marian David, Dirk Kindermann, Andrea Onofri
3rd Fragmentation Workshop
3rd Fragmentation Workshop: Fragmentation and the Content of Belief
Graz, 17-18 March 2017
The 3rd Fragmentation Workshop: Fragmentation and the Content of Belief is organised by the research project The Fragmented Mind and will take place at the University of Graz, Austria, on March 17-18, 2017.
- Prof. Imogen Dickie (University of Toronto)
- Prof. François Recanati (Institut Jean Nicod – Paris)
- Prof. Robert Stalnaker (MIT)
- Prof. Seth Yalcin (UC Berkeley)
Fragmentation, or compartmentalisation, is roughly the view that a single agent has various separate systems of belief, which need not make for a consistent and deductively closed overall system. This notion of fragmentation has been employed in the work of Cherniak, Lewis, and Stalnaker, and has more recently been developed by philosophers such as Egan, Greco, Rayo, Yalcin and others.
The goal of this workshop is to examine the potential role of fragmentation in accounting for the content of belief and other propositional attitudes. The nature of belief content remains one of the most fascinating and debated issues in contemporary philosophy of mind. The fragmentation hypothesis promises to provide a novel perspective on this challenging issue.
Non-exhaustive list of topics:
- Can fragmentation solve notorious problems arising for possible-worlds accounts of mental content, such as the “problem of deduction”?
- What role can fragmentation play in a theory of mathematical and logical knowledge?
- Can fragmentation provide a novel solution to Frege’s Puzzle, i.e. the puzzle of explaining the possibility of confusion and ignorance about the identity of certain objects (e.g. Hesperus and Phosphorus)?
- Can fragmentation help illuminate the nature of “modes of presentation”?
- Should structured theories of mental content (e.g. Fregean and Russellian views) appeal to fragmentation?
- What is the connection between mental and linguistic content from the perspective of fragmentation accounts?
Organizers: Andrea Onofri, Cristina Borgoni, Marian David, Dirk Kindermann
Contact: Andrea Onofri, email@example.com
Institute of Philosophy, University of Graz, Austria